Insight & Analysis

The outlook for interest rates ahead

Published: Nov 2024
ECR Research logo

In the five months from April this year, borrowing costs have declined on the outlook for central bank rate cuts. However, there are several factors that will keep short-term borrowing costs under downward pressure, but will increasingly cause long-term rates to rise.

Magnifying glass looking for rates

Steeper yield curves

The Fed has a clear objective:

  • It wants to prevent a recession as this could lead to another credit crisis.

  • It wants to ensure that unemployment stays at levels a little bit above 4%. Lower unemployment entails the risk of higher levels of wage increases and inflation.

This means that, by definition, the central bank wants to stabilise economic growth around potential growth. This is the level at which unemployment remains constant and inflation will not rise. Potential growth is the sum of workforce growth and productivity growth.

The workforce has increased sharply this year due to a wave of immigration. Both Democrats and Republicans want to curb this wave quickly.

Measures have been taken, which have led to a significant decline in immigration and the workforce is already under pressure due to the ageing population. This may lead to longer working weeks and/or an extension of working life into old age. In any case, we assume that, compared to recent decades, workforce growth (or rather, the total number of hours worked) will slow down significantly in the coming years.

Chart 1: Contribution of immigrant workers* to US (potential) growth has increased

*% of US civilian labour force employed persons aged 16+ born outside USA

Source: LSEG Datastream/ECR Research

The AI component

Chart one means that potential growth can only be maintained if productivity growth starts to accelerate sharply. Productivity has already increased in recent quarters. This is mostly attributed to modern technology, and to artificial intelligence (AI) in particular. However, it is doubtful whether this conclusion is correct, as the labour market has become progressively tight in recent quarters. In this scenario, productivity will generally increase of its own accord as companies try to squeeze as much production out of existing workers as possible. It remains to be seen whether this phenomenon will continue for long. We also suspect that AI optimism is overblown. A growing number of experts are coming to this conclusion. Also, it is increasingly apparent that vast sums of money are being invested in AI, while, for now, these investments nowhere near generate the returns that justify the level of investment. In addition, China in particular is not idle in this area. Indeed, China is ahead of the US in many AI areas. This means that competition often leads to price declines in areas where AI can be applied quickly. This, in turn, limits the added-value.

Chart 2: Has a new US productivity boom begun lately?

Source: LSEG Datastream/ECR Research

In any event, the Fed believes that potential growth was at roughly 2.3% when immigration was still very high, and that it is currently falling back to about 1.8%. We believe this figure to be 2% for now. However, assuming the economy will grow around potential, the additional tax revenue a 2% steady growth will generate won’t be sufficient to cover additional spending on defence, climate change control, additional care for the elderly and far higher interest payments.

In short, the medium-term outlook will be one of fairly low growth with rising public deficits. An additional problem here is the global upward inflationary pressure due to deglobalisation and protectionism. Another factor is labour market tightness caused by the ageing population. For now, we assume that (looming) labour shortages will not be adequately offset by AI induced productivity gains.

If this conclusion is correct, the Fed should ensure that growth ends up below the 2% potential growth rate rather than above it. In light of the tight US labour market, this will in our view mean the Fed will cut rates less than the market is currently discounting. Combined with stubbornly large public deficits and the worrisome long-term outlook for US government finances, this also means that interest rates will remain relatively high, and they could even rise. This, in turn, would be disastrous for public finances in the longer term. Ultimately, this will result in much higher taxes, which will severely dent economic growth, or increasing pressure on the central bank to pursue an inflationary policy. As the latter option is the road of least resistance, we expect that inflation expectations will rise much further in the coming years, as will long-term rates and borrowing costs.

Alarming European prospects

For Europe, the outlook is not better compared to the US:

  • In Europe, workforce growth and productivity growth rates are far lower than in the US. Hence, potential growth in Europe is close to 1%.

  • The Draghi report, published in September, clearly indicates that regulation in Europe is out of control and that there are far too few large European companies that can sufficiently invest in the development of new technology. This is partly because a real union in terms of banking and sales territory is still a long way away.

  • Europe lags behind China and the US in terms of technological development. Furthermore, Europe’s supply lines of rare commodities are far less secure and the continent is still politically and militarily incapable of defending itself properly. Efforts are being made to this end, but it will take many years before Europe has its house in order.

All this means that growth in Europe cannot far exceed 1% in the coming years if the ECB is to keep inflation under control (lower interest rates and increases in real disposable income will likely boost growth somewhat in the period ahead). Europe is also grappling with persistent large public deficits and high government debt levels. In a low growth environment, it will be increasingly difficult to bring government finances on a sustainable path, given the large unfunded pension obligations and rising health care costs as a result of aging societies. Consequently, pressure on the ECB will increase as well to pursue an inflationary monetary policy in order to keep the governments funded at affordable levels.

Conclusion

In light of the above, we expect central banks in the US and Europe will be quick to lower rates if economic growth slows further, but will be slow to react in case the economy performs better than expected and inflation (expectations) are under upward pressure. This will result in more upward pressure on long-term rates, while short-term rates will likely remain low or will drop further in the coming quarters to years.

All our content is free, just register below

As we move to a new and improved digital platform all users need to create a new account. This is very simple and should only take a moment.

Already have an account? Sign In

Already a member? Sign In

This website uses cookies and asks for your personal data to enhance your browsing experience. We are committed to protecting your privacy and ensuring your data is handled in compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).