The US dollar continues to be the most dominant currency for global trade flows. Most multinationals are forced to deal with significant USD flows throughout their financial supply chain around the world. Managing these flows across different regions, time-zones and regulatory environments can be very challenging, whether organisations are collecting USD from customers, paying USD to their suppliers or investing excess USD. For those excess funds, what options are available to optimise returns on USD located around the globe? In a recent webinar hosted by Treasury Today, senior executives from BNP Paribas discussed why the USD is the most dominant currency globally.
Walid Shuman opened proceedings by identifying the key challenges in managing USD flows globally: control, visibility, time zones, regulations and cost/efficiency.
The presentation emphasised that a myriad of opportunities exist to most effectively manage your USD and optimise returns on your cash. With the multitude of investment options, irrespective of a centralised or decentralised treasury structure, it is important to work with your banking providers to understand what solutions best enable your company to optimise its cash.
Shuman recommended corporates should “speak with their banking partners to source advice on whether a centralised or decentralised model makes more sense and where to locate the company’s US dollars.”
BNP Paribas regularly receives questions from its clients on structure types such as:
“Can I centralise my USD accounts globally in the US and manage my payments and collections worldwide centrally?”
“Could this structure type (centralised/decentralised) work for my company and, if so, what are the pros/cons?”
For some companies a centralised structure in the US works very efficiently and achieves all of the benefits without losing any local advantages.
James Santoro discussed the question of centralised vs decentralised structures and the three key pillars of any investment decision, namely liquidity, yield and risk. Please see the table below. He also spoke about Basel III and how banks, such as BNP Paribas, are dealing with the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) requirement.
The presentation also explained that not all liquidity is valued equally by banks. As Santoro explained, “The ability to provide banks with additional transactions or the ability to place funds ‘out along the curve’ will translate into the highest yields.”
If you missed the live webinar and would like to watch the full presentation it is available at treasurytoday.com/webinars
Jan Rottiers moved the conversation into the area of centralisation and decentralisation enablers and how the two approaches will impact the cash pooling (notional and/or physical) solutions available: “Centralisation is not a goal in itself,” he explained.
The presentation concluded by revisiting the three key questions posed at the opening of the webinar:
Degree of centralisation.
Key drivers and considerations.
Cost/benefit.
Optimise yield.
Cost efficiencies.
Working capital.
Non-economic benefits.
Opportunities exist, irrespective of structure.
Decentralised structure – products that enable ‘aggregating’ cash.
Centralised structure – products/providers that value incremental cash.